Why Your Resume Is a Narrative Problem

Every resume advice article tells you the same things: use action verbs, quantify your impact, keep it to one page. That advice isn't wrong, but it misses the bigger problem.

The real issue

Most resumes read like a list of things that happened to someone. They're chronological, factual, and forgettable. But hiring managers don't want a timeline — they want a story.

A good narrative answers three questions:

1. Where did you start? What was the context when you joined?
2. What did you do? Not your job description — your actual contributions.
3. What changed because of you? The before and after.

Lists vs. narratives

Here's a typical resume bullet:

Developed microservices architecture using Node.js and Kubernetes

Now here's the same work, told as a narrative:

Migrated a monolithic API serving 2M daily requests to a microservices architecture, reducing deploy times from 45 minutes to under 3 and eliminating cascading failures that had caused two major outages.

Same work. Completely different impact on the reader.

The compound effect

When every bullet point follows the narrative pattern, something interesting happens — your resume stops being a list and becomes a trajectory. Hiring managers can see the arc: the problems got harder, the scope got bigger, the impact got deeper.

That's what separates a resume that gets interviews from one that gets filed away.

How we think about this at Wrok

This is the core idea behind Wrok. Instead of asking you to fill out form fields, we ask you to tell us about your work in your own words. Then we help you find the narrative thread and shape it into something compelling.

Your career isn't a spreadsheet. It's a story. Your resume should read like one.